http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/488535/20130710/lavezzi-pompeii-statue-bust-naples-psg.htm
Sadly, this incident, while widely reported
because it involves a prominent European football star, illustrates
many flaws in Italian cultural patrimony laws. These laws are often
enforced unevenly, with the powerful and influential escaping
prosecution. They tend to focus on punishment alone as a solution to the
problem of looting or unauthorized ownership of antiquities, rather
than following a more rational model that would encourage reporting of
finds by the public with financial incentives. And these laws are based
solely on outdated nationalistic, emotional arguments that all Roman
antiquities, for example, must belong to the modern Italian state, which
of course has very little relationship to the vast majority of ancient
Roman artifacts. In the case of Pompeii and many other Italian
archaeological sites, the near total neglect of these sites, in terms of
the Italian government’s overall financial resources, is a disgrace,
given the sheer scale of tourism these sites generate. Perhaps I’ll
engage in a more detailed examination of these issues using this blog in
the near future.
Clio Ancient Art and Antiquities seeks to make antiquities and artifacts of the Mediterranean world accessible to a wide audience while offering print and electronic resources to both the novice and experienced collector of ancient art. With 25 years experience collecting and extensive travel in the Mediterranean world, owner Chris Maupin has consulted on ancient art for museums and private collectors.
Friday, July 12, 2013
Monday, July 8, 2013
Late Roman Rod Formed Glass Vase Amulets
Among the more intriguing and beautiful glass antiquities available
on our website are three examples of vase amulets dating from the later
Roman era. These come in a variety of forms and colors, and first appear
in the archaeological record around the mid-3rd Century AD (or CE, if
one prefers). Production seems to have begun in the broader Syria /
Palestine area, though examples have been found over a very wide area,
including western Europe. It is thought that as they spread beyond their
initial point of manufacture they were copied by glass artisans
elsewhere.
The purpose or symbolism of these objects remains obscure. It has been suggested that their appearance and diffusion is somehow directly connected to the spread of Christianity but there is very little evidence to support this.
Links to these objects on our site and “clickable” images -
The purpose or symbolism of these objects remains obscure. It has been suggested that their appearance and diffusion is somehow directly connected to the spread of Christianity but there is very little evidence to support this.
These remarkable objects were
created by bead makers, not glass blowers. Their structure is basically
that of a short tubular bead, closed at one end, tooled to create a neck
or mouth, and enhanced with a tiny loop handle and either trailed and
marvered decoration in a contrasting color or a contrasting latticework
applied to the body. the first example shown below is an example of the
latticework type, while the second and third examples illustrate the
trailed decoration.
Links to these objects on our site and “clickable” images -
For further reading on this class of objects we recommend:
* E. Marianne Stern, Roman, Byzantine, and Early Medieval Glass, 10 BCE – 700 CE, Ernesto Wolf Collection, Osfildern-Ruit, 2001,
* Maud Spaer, Ed., Ancient Glass in the Israel Museum, Beads and Other Small Objects, Israel Museum, Jerusalem, 2001.
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
A Few Thoughts About Ancient Coins on Our Website
Although Clio Ancient Art deals primarily in antiquities and ancient art - bronze sculptures and utilitarian objects, glass vessels & objects, ceramic vessels, oil lamps, even textiles - we do try to carry a variety of ancient coins.
Our selection of ancient coins is, admittedly, rather atypical. While many ancient coin dealers focus on strictly "Classical" coins, that is, Greek and Roman coins, we try to offer both these and a wide variety of coins influenced in some way by classical antiquity. These include coins from the Byzantine Empire, the Islamic world, the Indian subcontinent, the European Middle Ages and cultures tangential to the broader Greco-Roman world.
Here are a few samples of both Classical and other ancient and Medieval coins on our website; enjoy --
* Roman Empire, Bronze Follis of Maximinus II, AD 310-311: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i275.html
* Roman Provincial, Bronze 4.5 Assaria of Gordion III & Tranquillina: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i427.html
* Himyarite Kingdom. Amdin Bayyan. Silver Hemiobol. circa AD 100: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i266.html
* Islamic, Samanid Dynasty, Bronze Fals of Mansur I, AD 961-976: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i425.html
* India, Western Satraps, Silver Drachm of Rudrasimha II, AD 305-313: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i424.html
Labels:
ancient,
antiquities,
antiquity,
archaeology,
art,
artifacts,
Byzantine,
coins,
culture,
Greece,
heritage,
history,
Islamic,
Medieval,
numismatics,
Roman,
Roman Empire,
Rome
Monday, July 1, 2013
A Great Resource: Our Books & Publications Page includes framed & unframed antique prints dealing with antiquity, out of print and hard to find antiquities research journals, antiquarian books, antiquities auction catalogs and much more...
A
Great Resource: Our Books & Publications Page includes framed &
unframed antique prints dealing with antiquity, out of print and hard
to find antiquities research journals, antiquarian books, antiquities
auction catalogs and much more...
http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c25_p1.html
http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c25_p1.html
Saturday, June 29, 2013
Tiny, Rare and Noteworthy: A Group of Byzantine Buttons on Our Website
Overlooked by collectors and museums visiting our website to acquire
higher profile antiquities, such as Greek vases, Egyptian burial items
or Roman sculptures, is a group of 3 tiny buttons in various materials,
dating to the middle Byzantine era. These are exceptionally rare and
deserve to be highlighted here. Link: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i205.html
The history of buttons is rather hazy, with button-like objects of uncertain use appearing in the archaeological record as far back as 2000 BCE. The first functional buttons, appearing in the Roman Imperial age, were limited in their use to elite members of society and were intended as much for decoration as practicality. But with the infusion of migratory cultures from the Eurasian steppe into Western Europe and the Balkans at the end of Antiquity and during the early Middle Ages, functional buttons became widespread. There is conjecture that the use of buttons in place of other fasteners (brooches and pins) resulted as much from colder climate conditions beginning around the same time as the fall of the western provinces Roman Empire, as much as from new cultural influences. In any case, Byzantine society adopted the use of buttons quickly.
The 3 buttons in our group are each made from different materials: bone, rock crystal and what appears to be steatite (soap stone). The simple steatite example is relatively common, with other examples in a variety of common stones known from excavations. By contrast, the bone example is quite elaborately worked with multiple fields of decoration involving both incision and infilling the incised decoration with a resistant material, possibly pitch. Very similar examples have been found in Byzantine layers at Corinth. This belonged to an elite individual whose clothing must certainly have reflected their status. Although its function is obvious, the small rock crystal example may be unique; we have not yet found documentation of another excavated and dated example in rock crystal, which was highly valued. Such a button would also have come from the garments of a high status individual.
Tiny as these objects are, they do offer just a glimpse into Byzantine society in its middle phase, the 9th to 13th Centuries. Their survival is, as with so many antiquities, a minor miracle.
To see more Byzantine antiquities on our website, visit these pages:
http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c26_p1.html and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c21_p1.html
The history of buttons is rather hazy, with button-like objects of uncertain use appearing in the archaeological record as far back as 2000 BCE. The first functional buttons, appearing in the Roman Imperial age, were limited in their use to elite members of society and were intended as much for decoration as practicality. But with the infusion of migratory cultures from the Eurasian steppe into Western Europe and the Balkans at the end of Antiquity and during the early Middle Ages, functional buttons became widespread. There is conjecture that the use of buttons in place of other fasteners (brooches and pins) resulted as much from colder climate conditions beginning around the same time as the fall of the western provinces Roman Empire, as much as from new cultural influences. In any case, Byzantine society adopted the use of buttons quickly.
The 3 buttons in our group are each made from different materials: bone, rock crystal and what appears to be steatite (soap stone). The simple steatite example is relatively common, with other examples in a variety of common stones known from excavations. By contrast, the bone example is quite elaborately worked with multiple fields of decoration involving both incision and infilling the incised decoration with a resistant material, possibly pitch. Very similar examples have been found in Byzantine layers at Corinth. This belonged to an elite individual whose clothing must certainly have reflected their status. Although its function is obvious, the small rock crystal example may be unique; we have not yet found documentation of another excavated and dated example in rock crystal, which was highly valued. Such a button would also have come from the garments of a high status individual.
Tiny as these objects are, they do offer just a glimpse into Byzantine society in its middle phase, the 9th to 13th Centuries. Their survival is, as with so many antiquities, a minor miracle.
To see more Byzantine antiquities on our website, visit these pages:
http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c26_p1.html and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c21_p1.html
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Every Coin Tells A Story: A Survivor from the Cilician Kingdom of Armenia
The silver coin pictured here, a “Tram” of the Cilician
Armenian ruler Levon I, is a survivor from a rather remarkable episode in the
Medieval history of the Eastern Mediterranean.
Our story begins far to the east, with the conquest of much of the Middle East by the Seljuk Turks. Fleeing their original homelands in what had been the ancient Kingdom of Armenia, long a pawn in the conflicts between the Roman and Persian Empires, thousands of Armenians established a principality in what today is the southernmost coastal region of Turkey and the northernmost coastal region of Syria. During the final quarter of the 11th Century, under the first King of the Rubenid Dynasty, they declared independence from the Byzantine empire. Our coin was issued by Levon I, perhaps the most successful ruler during this initial phase of the Kingdom’s history.
Although the new Kingdom prospered economically due to its geography, which included an arc of high mountains providing some degree of protection and a narrow but fertile coastal plain that featured several good ports for trade, it was always at risk and short on allies. Nearly surrounded by hostile Islamic states, at various times it allied itself with the new Mongol rulers of Iran, Mesopotamia and Syria, the Ilkhanids, who were not yet fully converted to Islam, occasionally with the Byzantine Empire to the north and especially with the European Crusader states that sprang up along the Levantine coast shortly after its own birth (see also a coin of the Crusader Principality of Antioch & County of Tripoli on our website: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i280.html) .
One outcome of the Crusader alliance was extensive marriage between the new Crusader aristocracy and the 2 Armenian ruling families, the Rubenids and Hetumids. The Hetumids later formed a close marriage based alliance with the Frankish Lusignan Dynasty, who ruled the nearby Island of Cyprus. On our coin, this western influence is clearly visible, even during the Kingdom’s early years– http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i300.html. On the reverse is the Armenian rampant lion while the obverse includes a forward facing seated king holding a sceptre topped with the Frankish fleur-de-lis.
Conducting business in any of the Cilician ports or towns during the Kingdom’s almost 300 year history would have involved a bewildering array of currency. In addition to the silver and bronze coinage issued by the official mints of Armenian Cilicia, accepted forms of currency included Venetian, Genoese and Pisan coinage, Islamic Dirhems issued by the Mamluks, Ilkhanids and other local dynasties, and coins issued by the various Crusader principalities. While all of these had a rough, easy to understand relationship to one another based on weight of precious metal, implementing this in actual practice would have called for both good math skills and shrewd bargaining skills.
Despite intermarriage with the Lusignans, the Cillician Armenian Kingdom could not survive onslaughts from the powerful Mamluk rulers based in Egypt, who had effectively halted the Mongol advance. By the early 14th Century, the Mongol rulers of the Middle East had converted to Islam and the Crusader states along the coast of Palestine had all fallen or been abandoned, thus depriving the Armenians of key allies. The Kingdom fell in 1375, and the last King of Cilician Armenia died in exile in Paris in 1396.
This relatively minor but remarkable chapter in history serves to remind us of the religious, political and philosophical complexities of that part of the world, as we should be very much aware from recent news. The improbability of this chapter also reminds us that truth is always stranger than fiction. Of course, this is the beauty of ancient and medieval coinage; it always tells a fascinating story and sometimes provides the only clues to understanding particular events in history.
Our story begins far to the east, with the conquest of much of the Middle East by the Seljuk Turks. Fleeing their original homelands in what had been the ancient Kingdom of Armenia, long a pawn in the conflicts between the Roman and Persian Empires, thousands of Armenians established a principality in what today is the southernmost coastal region of Turkey and the northernmost coastal region of Syria. During the final quarter of the 11th Century, under the first King of the Rubenid Dynasty, they declared independence from the Byzantine empire. Our coin was issued by Levon I, perhaps the most successful ruler during this initial phase of the Kingdom’s history.
Although the new Kingdom prospered economically due to its geography, which included an arc of high mountains providing some degree of protection and a narrow but fertile coastal plain that featured several good ports for trade, it was always at risk and short on allies. Nearly surrounded by hostile Islamic states, at various times it allied itself with the new Mongol rulers of Iran, Mesopotamia and Syria, the Ilkhanids, who were not yet fully converted to Islam, occasionally with the Byzantine Empire to the north and especially with the European Crusader states that sprang up along the Levantine coast shortly after its own birth (see also a coin of the Crusader Principality of Antioch & County of Tripoli on our website: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i280.html) .
One outcome of the Crusader alliance was extensive marriage between the new Crusader aristocracy and the 2 Armenian ruling families, the Rubenids and Hetumids. The Hetumids later formed a close marriage based alliance with the Frankish Lusignan Dynasty, who ruled the nearby Island of Cyprus. On our coin, this western influence is clearly visible, even during the Kingdom’s early years– http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i300.html. On the reverse is the Armenian rampant lion while the obverse includes a forward facing seated king holding a sceptre topped with the Frankish fleur-de-lis.
Conducting business in any of the Cilician ports or towns during the Kingdom’s almost 300 year history would have involved a bewildering array of currency. In addition to the silver and bronze coinage issued by the official mints of Armenian Cilicia, accepted forms of currency included Venetian, Genoese and Pisan coinage, Islamic Dirhems issued by the Mamluks, Ilkhanids and other local dynasties, and coins issued by the various Crusader principalities. While all of these had a rough, easy to understand relationship to one another based on weight of precious metal, implementing this in actual practice would have called for both good math skills and shrewd bargaining skills.
Despite intermarriage with the Lusignans, the Cillician Armenian Kingdom could not survive onslaughts from the powerful Mamluk rulers based in Egypt, who had effectively halted the Mongol advance. By the early 14th Century, the Mongol rulers of the Middle East had converted to Islam and the Crusader states along the coast of Palestine had all fallen or been abandoned, thus depriving the Armenians of key allies. The Kingdom fell in 1375, and the last King of Cilician Armenia died in exile in Paris in 1396.
This relatively minor but remarkable chapter in history serves to remind us of the religious, political and philosophical complexities of that part of the world, as we should be very much aware from recent news. The improbability of this chapter also reminds us that truth is always stranger than fiction. Of course, this is the beauty of ancient and medieval coinage; it always tells a fascinating story and sometimes provides the only clues to understanding particular events in history.
Labels:
ancient,
antiquities,
antiquity,
archaeology,
Armenia,
art,
artifacts,
Byzantine,
coins,
culture,
Cyprus,
Egypt,
Frankish,
heritage,
history,
Islamic,
Medieval
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Clio's Start of Summer / 4th of July Sale
Hello
Customers, Friends & Fans of Clio Ancient Art:
It’s that
time of year! Time for our annual Start of Summer / 4th of July
Sale.
Between
today, Sunday, June 23 and Thursday, July 4, you may take advantage of the
following discounts offered on our website –
·
15% off ALL Cypriot, Egyptian, Greek, Roman,
Byzantine, Etruscan, Near Eastern, Migration Period and Early Islamic antiquities,
regardless of current price.
·
10% off any books, catalogs, magazines,
framed or unframed artwork in our books and publications page priced at over
$30.
·
10% off any ancient or medieval coins priced
at over $30.
Here are
links to all categories on our site–
·
Cypriot
Antiquities: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c1_p1.html
·
Egyptian
Antiquities: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c2_p1.html
·
Greek,
Hellenistic & Greek South Italian Antiquities: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c3_p1.html
·
Roman
Antiquities (3 pages): http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c15_p1.html
http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c16_p1.html
and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c17_p1.html
·
Etruscan,
European, Migration, Byzantine, Islamic & Near Eastern Antiquities 2
pages): http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c26_p1.html
and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c21_p1.html
·
Ancient
Glass (2 pages): http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c13_p1.html
and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c24_p1.html
·
Ancient
Oil Lamps: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c14_p1.html
·
Ancient
Jewelry & Personal Adornment: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c19_p1.html
·
Ancient
Coins: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c18_p1.html
·
Books
& Art: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c25_p1.html
Thank you
for reading.
Best wishes,
Chris M. Maupin
Clio Ancient Art & Antiquities
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)