Overlooked by collectors and museums visiting our website to acquire
higher profile antiquities, such as Greek vases, Egyptian burial items
or Roman sculptures, is a group of 3 tiny buttons in various materials,
dating to the middle Byzantine era. These are exceptionally rare and
deserve to be highlighted here. Link: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i205.html
The history of buttons is rather hazy, with button-like objects of
uncertain use appearing in the archaeological record as far back as 2000
BCE. The first functional buttons, appearing in the Roman Imperial age,
were limited in their use to elite members of society and were intended
as much for decoration as practicality. But with the infusion of
migratory cultures from the Eurasian steppe into Western Europe and the
Balkans at the end of Antiquity and during the early Middle Ages,
functional buttons became widespread. There is conjecture that the use
of buttons in place of other fasteners (brooches and pins) resulted as
much from colder climate conditions beginning around the same time as
the fall of the western provinces Roman Empire, as much as from new
cultural influences. In any case, Byzantine society adopted the use of
buttons quickly.
The 3 buttons in our group are each made from different materials:
bone, rock crystal and what appears to be steatite (soap stone). The
simple steatite example is relatively common, with other examples in a
variety of common stones known from excavations. By contrast, the bone
example is quite elaborately worked with multiple fields of decoration
involving both incision and infilling the incised decoration with a
resistant material, possibly pitch. Very similar examples have been
found in Byzantine layers at Corinth. This belonged to an elite
individual whose clothing must certainly have reflected their status.
Although its function is obvious, the small rock crystal example may be
unique; we have not yet found documentation of another excavated and
dated example in rock crystal, which was highly valued. Such a button
would also have come from the garments of a high status individual.
Tiny as these objects are, they do offer just a glimpse into
Byzantine society in its middle phase, the 9th to 13th Centuries. Their
survival is, as with so many antiquities, a minor miracle.
To see more Byzantine antiquities on our website, visit these pages:
http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c26_p1.html and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c21_p1.html
Clio Ancient Art and Antiquities seeks to make antiquities and artifacts of the Mediterranean world accessible to a wide audience while offering print and electronic resources to both the novice and experienced collector of ancient art. With 25 years experience collecting and extensive travel in the Mediterranean world, owner Chris Maupin has consulted on ancient art for museums and private collectors.
Saturday, June 29, 2013
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Every Coin Tells A Story: A Survivor from the Cilician Kingdom of Armenia
The silver coin pictured here, a “Tram” of the Cilician
Armenian ruler Levon I, is a survivor from a rather remarkable episode in the
Medieval history of the Eastern Mediterranean.
Our story begins far to the east, with the conquest of much of the Middle East by the Seljuk Turks. Fleeing their original homelands in what had been the ancient Kingdom of Armenia, long a pawn in the conflicts between the Roman and Persian Empires, thousands of Armenians established a principality in what today is the southernmost coastal region of Turkey and the northernmost coastal region of Syria. During the final quarter of the 11th Century, under the first King of the Rubenid Dynasty, they declared independence from the Byzantine empire. Our coin was issued by Levon I, perhaps the most successful ruler during this initial phase of the Kingdom’s history.
Although the new Kingdom prospered economically due to its geography, which included an arc of high mountains providing some degree of protection and a narrow but fertile coastal plain that featured several good ports for trade, it was always at risk and short on allies. Nearly surrounded by hostile Islamic states, at various times it allied itself with the new Mongol rulers of Iran, Mesopotamia and Syria, the Ilkhanids, who were not yet fully converted to Islam, occasionally with the Byzantine Empire to the north and especially with the European Crusader states that sprang up along the Levantine coast shortly after its own birth (see also a coin of the Crusader Principality of Antioch & County of Tripoli on our website: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i280.html) .
One outcome of the Crusader alliance was extensive marriage between the new Crusader aristocracy and the 2 Armenian ruling families, the Rubenids and Hetumids. The Hetumids later formed a close marriage based alliance with the Frankish Lusignan Dynasty, who ruled the nearby Island of Cyprus. On our coin, this western influence is clearly visible, even during the Kingdom’s early years– http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i300.html. On the reverse is the Armenian rampant lion while the obverse includes a forward facing seated king holding a sceptre topped with the Frankish fleur-de-lis.
Conducting business in any of the Cilician ports or towns during the Kingdom’s almost 300 year history would have involved a bewildering array of currency. In addition to the silver and bronze coinage issued by the official mints of Armenian Cilicia, accepted forms of currency included Venetian, Genoese and Pisan coinage, Islamic Dirhems issued by the Mamluks, Ilkhanids and other local dynasties, and coins issued by the various Crusader principalities. While all of these had a rough, easy to understand relationship to one another based on weight of precious metal, implementing this in actual practice would have called for both good math skills and shrewd bargaining skills.
Despite intermarriage with the Lusignans, the Cillician Armenian Kingdom could not survive onslaughts from the powerful Mamluk rulers based in Egypt, who had effectively halted the Mongol advance. By the early 14th Century, the Mongol rulers of the Middle East had converted to Islam and the Crusader states along the coast of Palestine had all fallen or been abandoned, thus depriving the Armenians of key allies. The Kingdom fell in 1375, and the last King of Cilician Armenia died in exile in Paris in 1396.
This relatively minor but remarkable chapter in history serves to remind us of the religious, political and philosophical complexities of that part of the world, as we should be very much aware from recent news. The improbability of this chapter also reminds us that truth is always stranger than fiction. Of course, this is the beauty of ancient and medieval coinage; it always tells a fascinating story and sometimes provides the only clues to understanding particular events in history.
Our story begins far to the east, with the conquest of much of the Middle East by the Seljuk Turks. Fleeing their original homelands in what had been the ancient Kingdom of Armenia, long a pawn in the conflicts between the Roman and Persian Empires, thousands of Armenians established a principality in what today is the southernmost coastal region of Turkey and the northernmost coastal region of Syria. During the final quarter of the 11th Century, under the first King of the Rubenid Dynasty, they declared independence from the Byzantine empire. Our coin was issued by Levon I, perhaps the most successful ruler during this initial phase of the Kingdom’s history.
Although the new Kingdom prospered economically due to its geography, which included an arc of high mountains providing some degree of protection and a narrow but fertile coastal plain that featured several good ports for trade, it was always at risk and short on allies. Nearly surrounded by hostile Islamic states, at various times it allied itself with the new Mongol rulers of Iran, Mesopotamia and Syria, the Ilkhanids, who were not yet fully converted to Islam, occasionally with the Byzantine Empire to the north and especially with the European Crusader states that sprang up along the Levantine coast shortly after its own birth (see also a coin of the Crusader Principality of Antioch & County of Tripoli on our website: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i280.html) .
One outcome of the Crusader alliance was extensive marriage between the new Crusader aristocracy and the 2 Armenian ruling families, the Rubenids and Hetumids. The Hetumids later formed a close marriage based alliance with the Frankish Lusignan Dynasty, who ruled the nearby Island of Cyprus. On our coin, this western influence is clearly visible, even during the Kingdom’s early years– http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i300.html. On the reverse is the Armenian rampant lion while the obverse includes a forward facing seated king holding a sceptre topped with the Frankish fleur-de-lis.
Conducting business in any of the Cilician ports or towns during the Kingdom’s almost 300 year history would have involved a bewildering array of currency. In addition to the silver and bronze coinage issued by the official mints of Armenian Cilicia, accepted forms of currency included Venetian, Genoese and Pisan coinage, Islamic Dirhems issued by the Mamluks, Ilkhanids and other local dynasties, and coins issued by the various Crusader principalities. While all of these had a rough, easy to understand relationship to one another based on weight of precious metal, implementing this in actual practice would have called for both good math skills and shrewd bargaining skills.
Despite intermarriage with the Lusignans, the Cillician Armenian Kingdom could not survive onslaughts from the powerful Mamluk rulers based in Egypt, who had effectively halted the Mongol advance. By the early 14th Century, the Mongol rulers of the Middle East had converted to Islam and the Crusader states along the coast of Palestine had all fallen or been abandoned, thus depriving the Armenians of key allies. The Kingdom fell in 1375, and the last King of Cilician Armenia died in exile in Paris in 1396.
This relatively minor but remarkable chapter in history serves to remind us of the religious, political and philosophical complexities of that part of the world, as we should be very much aware from recent news. The improbability of this chapter also reminds us that truth is always stranger than fiction. Of course, this is the beauty of ancient and medieval coinage; it always tells a fascinating story and sometimes provides the only clues to understanding particular events in history.
Labels:
ancient,
antiquities,
antiquity,
archaeology,
Armenia,
art,
artifacts,
Byzantine,
coins,
culture,
Cyprus,
Egypt,
Frankish,
heritage,
history,
Islamic,
Medieval
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Clio's Start of Summer / 4th of July Sale
Hello
Customers, Friends & Fans of Clio Ancient Art:
It’s that
time of year! Time for our annual Start of Summer / 4th of July
Sale.
Between
today, Sunday, June 23 and Thursday, July 4, you may take advantage of the
following discounts offered on our website –
·
15% off ALL Cypriot, Egyptian, Greek, Roman,
Byzantine, Etruscan, Near Eastern, Migration Period and Early Islamic antiquities,
regardless of current price.
·
10% off any books, catalogs, magazines,
framed or unframed artwork in our books and publications page priced at over
$30.
·
10% off any ancient or medieval coins priced
at over $30.
Here are
links to all categories on our site–
·
Cypriot
Antiquities: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c1_p1.html
·
Egyptian
Antiquities: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c2_p1.html
·
Greek,
Hellenistic & Greek South Italian Antiquities: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c3_p1.html
·
Roman
Antiquities (3 pages): http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c15_p1.html
http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c16_p1.html
and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c17_p1.html
·
Etruscan,
European, Migration, Byzantine, Islamic & Near Eastern Antiquities 2
pages): http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c26_p1.html
and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c21_p1.html
·
Ancient
Glass (2 pages): http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c13_p1.html
and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c24_p1.html
·
Ancient
Oil Lamps: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c14_p1.html
·
Ancient
Jewelry & Personal Adornment: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c19_p1.html
·
Ancient
Coins: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c18_p1.html
·
Books
& Art: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c25_p1.html
Thank you
for reading.
Best wishes,
Chris M. Maupin
Clio Ancient Art & Antiquities
Friday, June 21, 2013
The Ubiquitous Unguentarium
No other type of ancient Roman glass vessel is so widespread and
common a find as the unguentarium (plural: unguentaria). As the name
suggests, it was intended as a container for precious liquids, such as
scented oils for personal or funerary use, medicinal creams and herbals
for culinary use.
This type of vessel’s origins rest in the Hellenistic period and earlier, when roughly spindle shaped containers in ceramic were quite common. With the introduction of glass blowing on a large scale in the first century, AD, glass unguentaria rapidly replaced ceramic containers. Unlike pottery, glass has the advantage of imparting no taste or scent to its contents.
While the basic form — a bulbous lower body, long narrow neck, usually with a constriction somewhere along its length, and a flared rim — is common to all unguentaria, the range of specific forms is tremendous. The example illustrated above (Link: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i62.html) is a quite uncommon miniature example. More typical perhaps is this example: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i60.html
One particularly striking variation on the basic theme is the so-called candlestick unguentarium. Here are 2 variations on that theme: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i117.html and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i81.html
Visitors to museums, when viewing displays of Roman glass, often ask where the lids or stoppers to these vessels are. In most cases, these were made from organic materials, including tightly wound plant fiber or wood. Examples excavated at Romano-Egyptian sites have been found with these organic materials intact, due to the extremely dry conditions.
There are many excellent sources we could recommend dealing with the ubiquitous unguentarium but here are two, in particular –
* Roman Glass in the Corning Museum of Glass, Volume One, David Whitehouse, Corning Museum of Glass, Corning, NY, 2007. This tremendous work includes 87 fully illustrated and described examples of unguentaria (author uses the term “Toilet Bottles).
* Roman Glass, Reflections of Everyday Life, Stuart J. Fleming, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 1997. This is a particularly good source for building an understanding of how these humble glass vessels were actually used in the lives of the ancient Romans.
Here are links to additional examples of ancient Roma glass unguentaria on our website –
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i397.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i59.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i415.html
For all types of ancient glass on our website, follow these links –
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c13_p1.html
and
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c24_p1.html
This type of vessel’s origins rest in the Hellenistic period and earlier, when roughly spindle shaped containers in ceramic were quite common. With the introduction of glass blowing on a large scale in the first century, AD, glass unguentaria rapidly replaced ceramic containers. Unlike pottery, glass has the advantage of imparting no taste or scent to its contents.
While the basic form — a bulbous lower body, long narrow neck, usually with a constriction somewhere along its length, and a flared rim — is common to all unguentaria, the range of specific forms is tremendous. The example illustrated above (Link: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i62.html) is a quite uncommon miniature example. More typical perhaps is this example: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i60.html
One particularly striking variation on the basic theme is the so-called candlestick unguentarium. Here are 2 variations on that theme: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i117.html and http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i81.html
Visitors to museums, when viewing displays of Roman glass, often ask where the lids or stoppers to these vessels are. In most cases, these were made from organic materials, including tightly wound plant fiber or wood. Examples excavated at Romano-Egyptian sites have been found with these organic materials intact, due to the extremely dry conditions.
There are many excellent sources we could recommend dealing with the ubiquitous unguentarium but here are two, in particular –
* Roman Glass in the Corning Museum of Glass, Volume One, David Whitehouse, Corning Museum of Glass, Corning, NY, 2007. This tremendous work includes 87 fully illustrated and described examples of unguentaria (author uses the term “Toilet Bottles).
* Roman Glass, Reflections of Everyday Life, Stuart J. Fleming, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 1997. This is a particularly good source for building an understanding of how these humble glass vessels were actually used in the lives of the ancient Romans.
Here are links to additional examples of ancient Roma glass unguentaria on our website –
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i397.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i59.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i415.html
For all types of ancient glass on our website, follow these links –
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c13_p1.html
and
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c24_p1.html
Labels:
ancient,
antiquities,
antiquity,
archaeology,
art,
artifacts,
ceramic,
culture,
Egypt,
Egyptian,
Egyptology,
glass,
heritage,
history,
pottery,
Roman Empire,
Rome
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Byzantine Pottery Oil Lamps from the Levant
Many of the ancient lamps on our website are Byzantine, mainly from
the Levant (what is now southern Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Israel /
Palestine). Unlike Roman hard fired ceramic red slip lamps of earlier
centuries, Byzantine lamps tend to be made from low fired pottery and
their designs reflect Christian symbolism.
In the Roman period, hard fired red slip lamps, of the types widely known from Italy and the European provinces and from North Africa — here is an example: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i30.html — were never widespread in the Levantine region. Instead, a wide range of low fired pottery lamps were made for differing communities, including Samaritans, Hellenized city dwellers, strictly observant Jews, and Roman immigrants involved in trade or the local administration.
One clearly distinguishing characteristic of Byzantine Levantine lamps is their difference in shape compared to earlier Roman types. The large circular discus that served as a platform for decorative images on most Roman examples disappears during the Byzantine period, with the result that most decoration, either abstract patterns or specific Christian symbols, tend to be concentrated along the shoulders of lamps or just beneath the wick hole on the nozzle. Here is an example – http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i340.html
Most are remarkably simple and utilitarian: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i360.html
Others are elaborately decorated with clear iconography: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i404.html
When the Levantine provinces of the Byzantine Empire fell to the Islamic armies in the mid-7th Century, there was no immediate change in styles. But change did slowly come. Some transitional types still include elaborate floral or abstract decoration – http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i379.html
Others show a clear shift away from Byzantine style towards purely geometric decoration – http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i303.html
For other examples of Byzantine lamps, all with clear provenance and detailed reference information, follow these links -
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i306.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i310.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i265.html
To visit our Ancient Oil Lamps page, go to: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c14_p1.html
In the Roman period, hard fired red slip lamps, of the types widely known from Italy and the European provinces and from North Africa — here is an example: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i30.html — were never widespread in the Levantine region. Instead, a wide range of low fired pottery lamps were made for differing communities, including Samaritans, Hellenized city dwellers, strictly observant Jews, and Roman immigrants involved in trade or the local administration.
One clearly distinguishing characteristic of Byzantine Levantine lamps is their difference in shape compared to earlier Roman types. The large circular discus that served as a platform for decorative images on most Roman examples disappears during the Byzantine period, with the result that most decoration, either abstract patterns or specific Christian symbols, tend to be concentrated along the shoulders of lamps or just beneath the wick hole on the nozzle. Here is an example – http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i340.html
Most are remarkably simple and utilitarian: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i360.html
Others are elaborately decorated with clear iconography: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i404.html
When the Levantine provinces of the Byzantine Empire fell to the Islamic armies in the mid-7th Century, there was no immediate change in styles. But change did slowly come. Some transitional types still include elaborate floral or abstract decoration – http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i379.html
Others show a clear shift away from Byzantine style towards purely geometric decoration – http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i303.html
For other examples of Byzantine lamps, all with clear provenance and detailed reference information, follow these links -
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i306.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i310.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i265.html
To visit our Ancient Oil Lamps page, go to: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/c14_p1.html
Labels:
ancient,
antiquities,
antiquity,
archaeology,
art,
artifacts,
Byzantine,
ceramic,
culture,
heritage,
history,
Islamic,
lamp,
museum,
oil lamps,
pottery,
Roman,
Roman Empire,
Rome
Thursday, June 13, 2013
A Byzantine St Menas Flask and Spiritual Continuity in Egypt
Political and social turmoil is still very much in evidence in Egypt
today, 16 months after Mubarak’s departure and 1 year after Morsi’s
election as Egypt’s President. Some of this unrest has had religious
overtones, involving friction between Egypt’s ancient Coptic community,
now numbering perhaps 10% of the population or 8 million persons, and
some elements of the Muslim majority.
In light of the rapid pace of social and political change seen in Egypt over the past couple of years, it may be easy to forget that the Coptic community has a remarkably long history, dating to St Mark’s introduction of the new faith in the 1st Century CE, and flourishing with the founding of monasticism in the 4th Century CE Egyptian desert by St Anthony, whose monastery still stands today. There is more than ample artifactual evidence for this continuity, including a “St Menas Flask” on our website (see the image above and the link here: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i386.html).
The namesake of this mold-made pottery flask, dating to the 6th or 7th Century CE, is considered by Coptic Christians to be a miracle worker and martyr. Menas lived in the late 3rd to early 4th Century when Egypt was a province of the Roman Empire. He presumably was tortured and killed for his faith at a time shortly before Emperor Constantine’s Edict of Toleration, which ended persecution of Christians. He was buried at a spot in the Western Desert southwest of Alexandria. In the late 5th Century CE, the daughter of Emperor Zeno was said to have been cured of leprousy at Menas’ shrine, and great numbers of people began traveling to the spot seeking cures or Menas’ intercession.
The flask on our website is characteristic of a large body of related pottery vessels found not only in the Mediterranean Near East but as far away as Italy, France, Germany and even England. These were either carried back home by pilgrims returning from St Menas’ shrine or sending these objects back to their families. They were typically filled with holy oil or water from the shrine.
Even after the arrival of Islam in Egypt in 641 CE, when the shrine and cathedral was destroyed, and the region’s gradual conversion to a Muslim majority during the middle ages, the shrine continued as a place of pilgrimage. It has been completely rebuilt in the modern era is still a popular destination. It is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site and is on their “danger” list.
The iconography on our flask requires some explanation. Both sides show essentially the same scene, one side shown above, the other side shown here:
The figure of St Means is shown facing forward, wearing a soldier’s tunic and with arms extended in blessing. A simplified cross appears above each arm. To either side is a schematic rendering of a kneeling camel, taken from the legend that when his body was being transported into the desert at a particular spot the camels refused to go any further and this wast taken as a sign that his shrine should be erected on that spot. This imagery is enclosed by a circular border and again by another border of beads or dots.
For additional reading, we recommend:the UNESCO page for Abu Mena, including an excellent slideshow – http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/90
Here is an image we took at the Petrie Museum of Egyptology, University College, London, of several similar examples -
For more examples of Coptic antiquities from Egypt on our website -
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i284.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i285.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i176.html
In light of the rapid pace of social and political change seen in Egypt over the past couple of years, it may be easy to forget that the Coptic community has a remarkably long history, dating to St Mark’s introduction of the new faith in the 1st Century CE, and flourishing with the founding of monasticism in the 4th Century CE Egyptian desert by St Anthony, whose monastery still stands today. There is more than ample artifactual evidence for this continuity, including a “St Menas Flask” on our website (see the image above and the link here: http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i386.html).
The namesake of this mold-made pottery flask, dating to the 6th or 7th Century CE, is considered by Coptic Christians to be a miracle worker and martyr. Menas lived in the late 3rd to early 4th Century when Egypt was a province of the Roman Empire. He presumably was tortured and killed for his faith at a time shortly before Emperor Constantine’s Edict of Toleration, which ended persecution of Christians. He was buried at a spot in the Western Desert southwest of Alexandria. In the late 5th Century CE, the daughter of Emperor Zeno was said to have been cured of leprousy at Menas’ shrine, and great numbers of people began traveling to the spot seeking cures or Menas’ intercession.
The flask on our website is characteristic of a large body of related pottery vessels found not only in the Mediterranean Near East but as far away as Italy, France, Germany and even England. These were either carried back home by pilgrims returning from St Menas’ shrine or sending these objects back to their families. They were typically filled with holy oil or water from the shrine.
Even after the arrival of Islam in Egypt in 641 CE, when the shrine and cathedral was destroyed, and the region’s gradual conversion to a Muslim majority during the middle ages, the shrine continued as a place of pilgrimage. It has been completely rebuilt in the modern era is still a popular destination. It is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site and is on their “danger” list.
The iconography on our flask requires some explanation. Both sides show essentially the same scene, one side shown above, the other side shown here:
The figure of St Means is shown facing forward, wearing a soldier’s tunic and with arms extended in blessing. A simplified cross appears above each arm. To either side is a schematic rendering of a kneeling camel, taken from the legend that when his body was being transported into the desert at a particular spot the camels refused to go any further and this wast taken as a sign that his shrine should be erected on that spot. This imagery is enclosed by a circular border and again by another border of beads or dots.
For additional reading, we recommend:the UNESCO page for Abu Mena, including an excellent slideshow – http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/90
Here is an image we took at the Petrie Museum of Egyptology, University College, London, of several similar examples -
For more examples of Coptic antiquities from Egypt on our website -
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i284.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i285.html
* http://www.clioancientart.com/catalog/i176.html
Labels:
ancient,
antiquities,
antiquity,
archaeology,
art,
artifacts,
Byzantine,
ceramic,
Coptic,
culture,
Egypt,
Egyptian,
Egyptology,
heritage,
history,
museum,
pottery,
Roman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)